PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPB vs. UITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPB vs. UITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than UITB's 0.01% return.


JCPB

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.60%
6M
0.21%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.69%

UITB

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.64%
6M
-0.04%
YTD
0.01%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$72.64M$71.69M$101.80M
$8.08M$6.52M$6.73M

JCPB vs. UITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.50%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.51%9.19%7.76%
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
0.01%7.32%1.81%6.49%-12.23%-0.88%7.99%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPB and UITB is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.84

The correlation between JCPB and UITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPB vs. UITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

UITB
UITB Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
UITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UITB Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
UITB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JCPB vs. UITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JCPBUITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.11

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.80

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

2.01

+1.03

JCPB vs. UITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the UITB Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPB and UITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JCPB vs. UITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, roughly equal to the maximum UITB drawdown of -17.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and UITB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPBUITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-17.02%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.80%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.94%

-4.75%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-16.88%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.77%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-4.29%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.11%

-0.05%

Volatility

JCPB vs. UITB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) at 1.03%. This indicates that JCPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPBUITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.03%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

2.84%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

3.51%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

5.66%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

4.96%

+0.07%

JCPB vs. UITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JCPB and UITB have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

JCPB vs. UITB - Dividend Comparison

JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than UITB's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.94%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%0.00%0.00%
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
4.23%4.04%3.89%3.14%2.32%1.95%2.79%3.01%2.99%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JCPB and UITB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JCPB has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to UITB (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs UITB's -17.02%.

On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 0.74% vs 0.15% for UITB. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 0.74% return vs 0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JCPB and UITB have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 4.23% for UITB.

JCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while UITB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Victory.

JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPB and UITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer