PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPB vs. IMTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPB vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's 0.14% return.


JCPB

1D
0.13%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.84%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*

IMTB

1D
0.16%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPB vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.71%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.51%9.19%7.76%
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
0.14%8.88%1.94%6.10%-12.75%-1.41%6.25%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPB and IMTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019

0.81

The correlation between JCPB and IMTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPB vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTB
IMTB Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IMTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPB vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCPBIMTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.99

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

6.13

+0.14

JCPB vs. IMTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the IMTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPB and IMTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCPBIMTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.41

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.09

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.36

+0.19

Drawdowns

JCPB vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and IMTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPBIMTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-18.15%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.86%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-6.80%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-18.11%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.58%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-4.13%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.92%

-0.03%

Volatility

JCPB vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) is 1.25%, while iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that JCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPBIMTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.46%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

3.02%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

4.05%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

6.28%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

5.18%

-0.13%

JCPB vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCPB vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison

JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than IMTB's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
4.52%4.40%4.42%4.13%2.90%2.49%2.63%2.91%3.04%2.75%0.40%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.92%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JCPB and IMTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMTB has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to JCPB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs IMTB's -18.15%.

On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 1.14% vs 0.58% for IMTB. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 1.14% return vs 0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 4.52% for IMTB.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.06% for IMTB.

JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPB and IMTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer