PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPB vs. EUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPB vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.13% return.


JCPB

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

EUSB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.19%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPB vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.58%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.51%3.17%
EUSB
iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF
0.13%7.45%1.83%5.80%-12.81%-1.29%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPB and EUSB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.90

The correlation between JCPB and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPB vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EUSB
EUSB Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPB vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCPBEUSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.09

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

6.26

+0.62

JCPB vs. EUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the EUSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPB and EUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCPBEUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.45

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.06

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.04

+0.50

Drawdowns

JCPB vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and EUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPBEUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-17.87%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.48%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-5.76%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-17.45%

+0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.36%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-6.50%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.82%

+0.07%

Volatility

JCPB vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) at 1.17%. This indicates that JCPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPBEUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.17%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.49%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.57%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

5.77%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

5.41%

-0.36%

JCPB vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCPB vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison

JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than EUSB's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EUSB
iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF
3.97%3.84%3.67%3.08%2.21%1.10%0.57%0.00%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.93%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JCPB and EUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JCPB has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to EUSB (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs EUSB's -17.87%.

On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 1.11% vs 0.34% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 1.11% return vs 0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.12% for EUSB.

JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPB and EUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer