JCHI vs. CNQQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) are both China Equities funds. JCHI is actively managed, while CNQQ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNQQ.

Performance

JCHI vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than CNQQ's 12.03% return.

JCHI

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: -0.36%
• 1Y: 16.23%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNQQ

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 7.11%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	0.50%	-3.91%
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	12.03%	-5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and CNQQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. CNQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 25
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JCHI	CNQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JCHI	CNQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.33	-0.08

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than CNQQ's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and CNQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	CNQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-17.82%	-11.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.41%	-1.09%	-6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.33%	-9.19%	-4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	CNQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	24.37%	-6.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.86%	24.37%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	24.37%	+0.49%

JCHI vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than CNQQ's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	0.23%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.80%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and CNQQ in my portfolio?

JCHI and CNQQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or CNQQ?

On fees, JCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or CNQQ?

JCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or CNQQ?

JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.23% for CNQQ.

What is the main difference between JCHI and CNQQ?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.75% for CNQQ.