JBND vs. TAGG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) and TAGG (T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JBND returned 2.80% vs 2.53% for TAGG. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for TAGG.

Performance

JBND vs. TAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than TAGG's 0.09% return.

JBND

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 1Y: 2.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.74%

TAGG

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.53%
• 3Y*: 4.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	$43.82M	$43.67M	$54.12M
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF	$10.15M	$7.44M	$11.12M

JBND vs. TAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	0.13%	8.21%	3.19%	7.43%
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF	0.09%	7.40%	1.73%	6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JBND and TAGG is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023	0.93

The correlation between JBND and TAGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JBND vs. TAGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JBND

JBND Risk / Return Rank: 27
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 27

TAGG

TAGG Risk / Return Rank: 24
TAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
TAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JBND vs. TAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JBND	TAGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.70	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	1.02	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.12	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	0.80	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	1.90	+0.47

JBND vs. TAGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the TAGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBND and TAGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JBND vs. TAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum TAGG drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and TAGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBND	TAGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-17.26%	+12.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.94%	-3.19%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-2.12%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-6.69%	+5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	1.34%	-0.16%

Volatility

JBND vs. TAGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) is 1.02%, while T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that JBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JBND	TAGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.14%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.92%	2.95%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	3.64%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.79%	6.46%	-1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.79%	6.46%	-1.67%

JBND vs. TAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGG's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JBND vs. TAGG - Dividend Comparison

JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than TAGG's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	4.44%	4.42%	4.58%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF	4.56%	4.36%	4.36%	3.48%	3.67%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBND and TAGG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, JBND and TAGG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JBND or TAGG?

TAGG has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to JBND (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBND dropped -4.48% vs TAGG's -17.26%.

Which ETF is better, JBND or TAGG?

On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 2.80% vs 2.53% for TAGG. On fees, TAGG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, JBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JBND or TAGG?

Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 2.80% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JBND or TAGG?

TAGG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JBND or TAGG?

TAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 4.44% for JBND.

What is the main difference between JBND and TAGG?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JBND and 0.08% for TAGG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.