PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBND vs. JPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBND vs. JPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than JPHY's 2.07% return.


JBND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPHY

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBND vs. JPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JBND and JPHY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.57

JBND vs. JPHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JBND
JPHY

Communication Services

25.7%
15.8%

Technology

19.7%
4.8%

Financial Services

9.0%
1.8%

Healthcare

3.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

2.6%
3.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
3.6%

Utilities

0.7%
2.8%

Energy

0.6%
7.0%

Industrials

0.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

JBND
25.7%
JPHY
15.8%

Technology

JBND
19.7%
JPHY
4.8%

Financial Services

JBND
9.0%
JPHY
1.8%

Healthcare

JBND
3.1%
JPHY
5.1%

Real Estate

JBND
2.6%
JPHY
3.0%

Basic Materials

JBND
0.8%
JPHY
3.6%

Utilities

JBND
0.7%
JPHY
2.8%

Energy

JBND
0.6%
JPHY
7.0%

Industrials

JBND
0.5%
JPHY
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JBND
0.3%
JPHY
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

JBND
0.1%
JPHY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBND vs. JPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBND
JBND Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JPHY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBND vs. JPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBNDJPHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

JBND vs. JPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBNDJPHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

2.17

-0.64

Drawdowns

JBND vs. JPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, which is greater than JPHY's maximum drawdown of -1.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and JPHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBNDJPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-1.65%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-0.09%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-0.21%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

JBND vs. JPHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBNDJPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

3.04%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

3.04%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

3.04%

+1.80%

JBND vs. JPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JPHY's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBND vs. JPHY - Dividend Comparison

JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than JPHY's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
4.41%4.42%4.58%1.00%
JPHY
JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF
5.92%3.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBND and JPHY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JBND.

JPHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.

JBND is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while JPHY is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JBND and 0.24% for JPHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBND and JPHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer