PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBL vs. FUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JBL vs. FUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jabil Inc. (JBL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBL achieves a 68.86% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, JBL has outperformed FUL with an annualized return of 36.43%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.


JBL

1D
2.10%
1M
8.29%
YTD
68.86%
6M
73.15%
1Y
115.17%
3Y*
57.72%
5Y*
46.53%
10Y*
36.43%

FUL

1D
0.05%
1M
7.21%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.17%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
0.07%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBL vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JBL
Jabil Inc.
68.86%58.73%13.25%87.43%-2.55%66.40%3.89%68.49%-4.41%12.17%
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
7.83%-10.46%-16.19%14.97%-10.59%57.84%2.15%22.42%-19.84%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JBL and FUL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1993

0.36

The correlation between JBL and FUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JBL:

$41.41B

FUL:

$3.53B

EPS

JBL:

$7.47

FUL:

$2.88

PE Ratio

JBL:

51.55

FUL:

22.06

PS Ratio

JBL:

1.28

FUL:

1.02

PB Ratio

JBL:

30.81

FUL:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

JBL:

$32.67B

FUL:

$3.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JBL:

$2.95B

FUL:

$1.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

JBL:

$1.55B

FUL:

$495.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBL vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBL
JBL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FUL
FUL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBL vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jabil Inc. (JBL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBLFULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.10

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

0.57

+5.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.74

1.77

+14.97

JBL vs. FUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the FUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBL and FUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBL vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBL drawdown since its inception was -94.92%, which is greater than FUL's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBL and FUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBLFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.92%

-68.25%

-26.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.86%

-26.97%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.83%

-43.45%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

-43.45%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.34%

-56.29%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.20%

+24.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.49%

-18.76%

-25.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.91%

8.68%

-1.77%

Volatility

JBL vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison

Jabil Inc. (JBL) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) at 11.90%. This indicates that JBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBLFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

11.90%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.16%

26.69%

+6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.38%

34.83%

+7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.94%

29.46%

+8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

31.13%

+6.05%

Dividends

JBL vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison

JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FUL's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.49%1.56%1.29%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
0.08%0.14%0.22%0.25%0.47%0.45%0.75%0.77%1.29%1.22%1.35%1.37%

Financials

JBL vs. FUL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jabil Inc. and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.28B
770.84M
(JBL) Total Revenue
(FUL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JBL vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jabil Inc. and H.B. Fuller Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
9.0%
31.3%
Portfolio components
JBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 8.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.0%.

FUL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

JBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

FUL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

JBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 223.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

FUL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JBL and FUL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBL has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to FUL (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBL dropped -94.92% vs FUL's -68.25%.

JBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBL and FUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer