JBBB vs. THQ
JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and THQ (Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund) are both funds - JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while THQ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Aberdeen. Over the past 3 years, JBBB returned 10.60%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for THQ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for THQ.
Performance
JBBB vs. THQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than THQ's -2.61% return.
JBBB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THQ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
JBBB vs. THQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 1.86% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.99% |
THQ Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund | -2.61% | 13.88% | 15.51% | -1.62% | -14.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and THQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBBB vs. THQ — Risk / Return Rank
JBBB
THQ
JBBB vs. THQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBBB | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.10 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 0.53 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 1.44 | +6.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBBB | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.50 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.36 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. THQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, smaller than the maximum THQ drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and THQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBBB | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -39.35% | +28.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -17.25% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | -25.86% | +22.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.82% | +7.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -8.63% | +7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 6.29% | -5.57% |
Volatility
JBBB vs. THQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) is 0.45%, while Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that JBBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBBB | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 5.15% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 12.84% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 18.24% | -14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 19.03% | -13.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 20.47% | -15.21% |
JBBB vs. THQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than THQ's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
JBBB vs. THQ - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, less than THQ's 12.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.13% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THQ Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund | 12.17% | 11.29% | 11.09% | 7.45% | 6.81% | 5.27% | 6.62% | 7.08% | 8.05% | 7.71% | 8.70% | 9.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBBB and THQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THQ has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to JBBB (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs THQ's -39.35%.
JBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBBB and THQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer