JBBB vs. ICLO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and ICLO (Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JBBB returned 10.60%/yr vs 6.75%/yr for ICLO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for ICLO.

Performance

JBBB vs. ICLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than ICLO's 2.11% return.

JBBB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICLO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 5.71%
• 3Y*: 6.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. ICLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	1.86%	5.43%	12.50%	17.63%	0.66%
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	2.11%	5.27%	7.05%	8.90%	0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and ICLO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.14

JBBB vs. ICLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JBBB	ICLO
Financial Services	4.2%	6.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JBBB vs. ICLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB

JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 51
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ICLO

ICLO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ICLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ICLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. ICLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JBBB	ICLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	4.20	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	7.14	-4.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.02	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	16.31	-14.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	70.34	-62.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JBBB vs. ICLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the ICLO Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBBB and ICLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JBBB	ICLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	4.20	-2.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	2.83	-1.53

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. ICLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than ICLO's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and ICLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBBB	ICLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-3.47%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-0.35%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.82%	-3.47%	-0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-0.06%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.08%	+0.64%

Volatility

JBBB vs. ICLO - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) at 0.31%. This indicates that JBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JBBB	ICLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	0.31%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	0.78%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.34%	1.37%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.26%	2.42%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	2.42%	+2.84%

JBBB vs. ICLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLO's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

JBBB vs. ICLO - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than ICLO's 5.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	5.12%	5.49%	6.51%	7.01%	0.00%
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	7.13%	8.41%	9.24%	8.71%	5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBBB and ICLO in my portfolio?

JBBB and ICLO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JBBB or ICLO?

JBBB has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to ICLO (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs ICLO's -3.47%.

Which ETF is better, JBBB or ICLO?

On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.60% vs 6.75% for ICLO. On fees, ICLO is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, ICLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JBBB or ICLO?

Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JBBB or ICLO?

ICLO is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JBBB or ICLO?

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 5.12% for ICLO.

What is the main difference between JBBB and ICLO?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.26% for ICLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.