JBBB vs. HYBB
JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and HYBB (iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while HYBB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB US High Yield Constrained Index (USD). JBBB is actively managed, while HYBB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JBBB returned 10.39%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for HYBB. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HYBB.
Performance
JBBB vs. HYBB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than HYBB's 1.17% return.
JBBB
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
JBBB vs. HYBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 1.88% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.88% |
HYBB iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 1.17% | 8.95% | 6.35% | 10.53% | -9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and HYBB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, JBBB and HYBB have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
JBBB vs. HYBB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JBBB
HYBB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
JBBB
HYBB
Basic Materials
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Communication Services
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Consumer Cyclical
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Consumer Defensive
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Energy
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Healthcare
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Industrials
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Real Estate
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Technology
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Utilities
JBBB
-
HYBB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBBB vs. HYBB — Risk / Return Rank
JBBB
HYBB
JBBB vs. HYBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (HYBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBBB | HYBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.61 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 11.74 | -4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBBB | HYBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.98 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.62 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. HYBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, smaller than the maximum HYBB drawdown of -15.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and HYBB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBBB | HYBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -15.28% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -2.48% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | -4.01% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.47% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -3.22% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.55% | +0.17% |
Volatility
JBBB vs. HYBB - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (HYBB) have volatilities of 0.88% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBBB | HYBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 0.92% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 2.57% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 3.29% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 6.93% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 6.67% | -1.41% |
JBBB vs. HYBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HYBB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JBBB vs. HYBB - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than HYBB's 5.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBB iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 5.88% | 6.08% | 6.22% | 6.28% | 5.04% | 3.86% | 0.76% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.12% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBBB and HYBB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYBB has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to JBBB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs HYBB's -15.28%.
On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.39% vs 7.83% for HYBB. On fees, HYBB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.39% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.
JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.12%, compared with 5.88% for HYBB.
JBBB is categorized as CLO, while HYBB is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.25% for HYBB.
HYBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBBB and HYBB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer