JBBB vs. CLOC
JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
JBBB vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than CLOC's 2.34% return.
JBBB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JBBB vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 1.86% | 1.20% |
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 2.34% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and CLOC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBBB vs. CLOC — Risk / Return Rank
JBBB
CLOC
JBBB vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBBB | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBBB | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 6.09 | -4.79 |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than CLOC's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and CLOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBBB | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -0.54% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -0.07% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | — | — |
Volatility
JBBB vs. CLOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBBB | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 0.91% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 0.91% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 0.91% | +4.35% |
JBBB vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JBBB and CLOC have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
JBBB vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than CLOC's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 3.67% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.13% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBBB and CLOC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JBBB and CLOC have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 3.67% for CLOC.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and AAM.
Find the right allocation for JBBB and CLOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer