PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBBB vs. CLOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBBB vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than CLOC's 2.34% return.


JBBB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.34%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*

CLOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
1.86%1.20%
CLOC
AAM Crescent CLO ETF
2.34%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and CLOC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBBB vs. CLOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBBBCLOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

JBBB vs. CLOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBBBCLOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

6.09

-4.79

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than CLOC's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and CLOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBBBCLOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-0.54%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-0.07%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

Volatility

JBBB vs. CLOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBBBCLOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

0.91%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.26%

0.91%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

0.91%

+4.35%

JBBB vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JBBB and CLOC have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

JBBB vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than CLOC's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLOC
AAM Crescent CLO ETF
3.67%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.13%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBBB and CLOC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JBBB and CLOC have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 3.67% for CLOC.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and AAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBBB and CLOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer