PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBALX vs. MSTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) and Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBALX achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than MSTGX's 6.45% return.


JBALX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.16%
YTD
3.95%
6M
3.97%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
11.06%

MSTGX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.45%
YTD
6.45%
6M
7.33%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
3.95%15.00%20.78%15.45%-16.56%17.28%14.40%21.88%-3.58%
MSTGX
Morningstar Global Income Fund
6.45%12.04%5.36%11.91%-11.18%8.46%3.92%19.97%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JBALX and MSTGX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between JBALX and MSTGX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBALX vs. MSTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBALX
JBALX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTGX
MSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) and Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBALXMSTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.56

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

11.50

-3.14

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MSTGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBALX and MSTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBALXMSTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.44

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.63

+0.03

Drawdowns

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBALX drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, which is greater than MSTGX's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBALX and MSTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBALXMSTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.98%

-27.52%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-4.38%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.93%

-6.56%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-19.64%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.79%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-4.33%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.58%

+0.29%

Volatility

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) at 2.29%. This indicates that JBALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBALXMSTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.29%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

4.89%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

6.40%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

8.14%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.24%

10.84%

+0.40%

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBALX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBALX vs. MSTGX - Dividend Comparison

JBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, more than MSTGX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
8.51%8.80%11.84%2.28%2.00%4.54%2.54%2.33%7.14%4.69%4.55%5.87%
MSTGX
Morningstar Global Income Fund
2.91%2.97%6.64%6.32%8.79%10.48%2.96%4.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBALX and MSTGX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBALX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to MSTGX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBALX dropped -33.98% vs MSTGX's -27.52%.

MSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBALX and MSTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer