PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBALX vs. GIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBALX achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than GIMFX's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, JBALX has outperformed GIMFX with an annualized return of 11.06%, while GIMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.


JBALX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.16%
YTD
3.95%
6M
3.97%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
11.06%

GIMFX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.11%
YTD
14.16%
6M
16.37%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
3.95%15.00%20.78%15.45%-16.56%17.28%14.40%21.88%0.71%17.83%
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
14.16%25.37%2.67%14.75%-1.24%4.05%-7.25%13.24%-5.58%14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between JBALX and GIMFX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.63

The correlation between JBALX and GIMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (5 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBALX vs. GIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBALX
JBALX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GIMFX
GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBALXGIMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.83

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

5.00

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

19.42

-11.07

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the GIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBALX and GIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBALXGIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

4.13

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.12

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.81

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.71

-0.04

Drawdowns

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBALX drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, which is greater than GIMFX's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBALX and GIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBALXGIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.98%

-25.87%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-6.53%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.93%

-8.02%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-14.02%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

-25.87%

+3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-4.29%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.68%

+0.19%

Volatility

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) is 2.45%, while GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that JBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBALXGIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.84%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

6.22%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

7.93%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

8.58%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.24%

8.98%

+2.26%

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBALX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMFX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBALX vs. GIMFX - Dividend Comparison

JBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, more than GIMFX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
3.75%4.28%3.39%5.93%3.59%3.28%2.25%3.99%4.59%2.95%1.98%0.00%
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
8.51%8.80%11.84%2.28%2.00%4.54%2.54%2.33%7.14%4.69%4.55%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBALX and GIMFX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIMFX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to JBALX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBALX dropped -33.98% vs GIMFX's -25.87%.

GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBALX and GIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer