JAVA vs. LSVD
JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JAVA returned 23.95% vs 43.26% for LSVD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.
Performance
JAVA vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAVA achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.67% return.
JAVA
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 23.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSVD
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 17.67%
- 6M
- 18.95%
- 1Y
- 43.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAVA vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 8.50% | 14.92% | 0.17% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 17.67% | 22.29% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAVA and LSVD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between JAVA and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
JAVA vs. LSVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JAVA
LSVD
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
JAVA
LSVD
Technology
JAVA
LSVD
Industrials
JAVA
LSVD
Healthcare
JAVA
LSVD
Consumer Cyclical
JAVA
LSVD
Communication Services
JAVA
LSVD
Energy
JAVA
LSVD
Consumer Defensive
JAVA
LSVD
Utilities
JAVA
LSVD
Basic Materials
JAVA
LSVD
Real Estate
JAVA
LSVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAVA vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank
JAVA
LSVD
JAVA vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAVA | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.61 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 5.38 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 24.69 | -13.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAVA | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 3.41 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.66 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
JAVA vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and LSVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAVA | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -19.30% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -8.07% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.53% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -2.47% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.76% | +0.48% |
Volatility
JAVA vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is 2.60%, while LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that JAVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAVA | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.36% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 9.52% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 12.76% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 17.45% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 17.45% | -2.65% |
JAVA vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAVA vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison
JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 1.25% | 1.34% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.25% | 0.48% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAVA and LSVD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to JAVA (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs LSVD's -19.30%.
On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 23.95% for JAVA. On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, JAVA has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 23.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.
JAVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.40% for LSVD.
LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAVA and LSVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer