JAVA vs. JPST

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAVA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAVA returned 16.35%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for JPST. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPST.

Performance

JAVA vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAVA achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.40% return.

JAVA

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 6M: 9.14%
• 1Y: 23.95%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPST

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAVA vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	8.50%	14.92%	15.52%	10.46%	-0.88%	5.23%
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.40%	4.99%	5.58%	5.13%	1.14%	-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between JAVA and JPST is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021	0.09

The correlation between JAVA and JPST shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JAVA vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JAVA	JPST
Financial Services	20.1%	22.6%
Technology	15.3%	1.8%
Industrials	13.9%	2.1%
Healthcare	12.5%	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	2.5%
Communication Services	8.4%	5.5%
Energy	5.5%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	0.7%
Utilities	4.1%	2.8%
Basic Materials	3.6%	0.2%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.7%

Return for Risk

JAVA vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAVA

JAVA Risk / Return Rank: 62
JAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
JAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

JPST

JPST Risk / Return Rank: 99
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAVA vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JAVA	JPST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	8.09	-5.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	17.60	-14.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	3.94	-2.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	29.16	-26.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	144.13	-133.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JAVA vs. JPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the JPST Sharpe Ratio of 8.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAVA and JPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAVA	JPST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	8.09	-5.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	6.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	3.20	-2.42

Drawdowns

JAVA vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and JPST.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAVA	JPST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-3.28%	-13.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-0.15%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-0.30%	-16.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.02%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-0.08%	-3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	0.03%	+2.21%

Volatility

JAVA vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that JAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAVA	JPST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	0.15%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.40%	0.36%	+8.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	0.54%	+10.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.80%	0.58%	+14.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.80%	0.93%	+13.87%

JAVA vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAVA vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than JPST's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	1.25%	1.34%	1.45%	1.65%	1.25%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF	4.26%	4.43%	5.16%	4.79%	1.83%	0.73%	1.43%	2.69%	2.07%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAVA and JPST in my portfolio?

JAVA and JPST have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAVA or JPST?

JAVA has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs JPST's -3.28%.

Which ETF is better, JAVA or JPST?

On 3-year performance, JAVA leads with 16.35% vs 5.16% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JAVA or JPST?

Over the 3-year period, JAVA has performed better with a 16.35% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAVA or JPST?

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAVA or JPST?

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.25% for JAVA.

What is the main difference between JAVA and JPST?

JAVA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.18% for JPST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.