JATAX vs. FDTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A (JATAX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX).
JATAX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013.
Performance
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JATAX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A | -7.07% | 24.77% | 32.09% | 55.02% | -37.75% | 17.31% | 50.90% | 45.36% | 0.72% | 44.47% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -10.89% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JATAX achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's -10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, JATAX has outperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 20.22%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.
JATAX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.50%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -6.64%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 20.22%
FDTRX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -11.59%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JATAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JATAX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank
JATAX
FDTRX
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A (JATAX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JATAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.80 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 1.31 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.83 | +0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 2.70 | +3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JATAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.80 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.24 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.67 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.66 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between JATAX and FDTRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison
JATAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, more than FDTRX's 11.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JATAX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A | 15.29% | 14.21% | 12.24% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 16.47% | 9.16% | 9.08% | 6.63% | 7.63% | 4.92% | 7.87% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 11.66% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JATAX drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FDTRX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JATAX and FDTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JATAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -48.10% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -20.39% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | -48.10% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.55% | -48.10% | +1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -16.37% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -9.22% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 6.25% | -1.55% |
Volatility
JATAX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A (JATAX) is 8.32%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that JATAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JATAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 9.28% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 16.81% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 26.47% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 26.27% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 24.53% | -0.14% |