JARTX vs. HFADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX).
JARTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 1, 1997. HFADX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003.
Performance
JARTX vs. HFADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JARTX vs. HFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARTX Janus Henderson Forty Fund | -16.07% | 17.88% | 27.76% | 39.50% | -33.81% | 22.30% | 38.69% | 36.30% | 1.10% | 10.10% |
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D | -1.41% | 5.88% | 1.69% | 6.30% | -16.54% | -0.74% | 9.45% | 9.58% | 0.56% | 1.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JARTX achieves a -16.07% return, which is significantly lower than HFADX's -1.41% return.
JARTX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -16.07%
- 6M
- -15.92%
- 1Y
- 8.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
HFADX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JARTX vs. HFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JARTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HFADX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JARTX vs. HFADX — Risk / Return Rank
JARTX
HFADX
JARTX vs. HFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JARTX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 1.70 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 2.36 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 2.30 | -2.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 9.45 | -8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JARTX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 1.70 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.14 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.32 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between JARTX and HFADX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JARTX vs. HFADX - Dividend Comparison
JARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than HFADX's 3.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARTX Janus Henderson Forty Fund | 16.27% | 13.65% | 11.51% | 9.10% | 0.06% | 10.26% | 8.38% | 7.05% | 8.95% | 14.50% | 6.57% | 15.93% |
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D | 3.49% | 3.75% | 2.94% | 2.40% | 8.93% | 1.47% | 4.47% | 3.62% | 5.05% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JARTX vs. HFADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JARTX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than HFADX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARTX and HFADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JARTX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -21.50% | -35.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -2.11% | -17.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.09% | -21.50% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.19% | -7.40% | -11.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -6.31% | -10.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 0.51% | +5.02% |
Volatility
JARTX vs. HFADX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) at 1.10%. This indicates that JARTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JARTX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 1.10% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 1.45% | +11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 2.54% | +20.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 5.92% | +15.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 5.01% | +16.32% |