JAPN vs. SPAQ
JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAPN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while SPAQ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JAPN returned -16.72% vs 4.98% for SPAQ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAPN achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPAQ's 2.81% return.
JAPN
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -13.01%
- 1Y
- -16.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | -13.33% | 2.80% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 2.81% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAPN and SPAQ is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAPN vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank
JAPN
SPAQ
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAPN | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.13 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.94 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 3.39 | -4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAPN | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 0.57 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.86 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAPN drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAPN and SPAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAPN | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.94% | -5.30% | -18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.94% | -5.30% | -18.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.90% | -0.01% | -22.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -0.54% | -8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.54% | 1.47% | +11.07% |
Volatility
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.95%. This indicates that JAPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAPN | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 1.95% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 5.01% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 8.80% | +9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 7.00% | +12.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 7.00% | +12.24% |
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JAPN and SPAQ have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
JAPN vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison
JAPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SPAQ's 16.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.23% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAPN and SPAQ have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JAPN has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to SPAQ (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAPN dropped -23.94% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.
On 1-year performance, SPAQ leads with 4.98% vs -16.72% for JAPN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPAQ has performed better with a 4.98% return vs -16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JAPN and SPAQ have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 0.28% for JAPN.
JAPN is categorized as Japan Equities, while SPAQ is Health & Biotech Equities.
SPAQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAPN and SPAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer