PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) and BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAPN.TO achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly higher than ZJPN.TO's 16.83% return.


JAPN.TO

1D
0.86%
1M
7.38%
YTD
19.35%
6M
23.23%
1Y
51.47%
3Y*
33.20%
5Y*
25.62%
10Y*

ZJPN.TO

1D
0.94%
1M
8.50%
YTD
16.83%
6M
16.80%
1Y
31.72%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JAPN.TO
CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF
19.35%30.66%29.25%35.51%10.49%
ZJPN.TO
BMO Japan Index ETF
16.83%19.62%16.50%16.10%-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JAPN.TO and ZJPN.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.51

The correlation between JAPN.TO and ZJPN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JAPN.TO
ZJPN.TO

Industrials

27.8%
26.2%

Financial Services

18.9%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
12.7%

Technology

12.0%
17.6%

Basic Materials

7.8%
3.6%

Healthcare

6.8%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
8.6%

Energy

1.9%
0.9%

Utilities

0.1%
1.3%

Real Estate

-

3.2%

Industrials

JAPN.TO
27.8%
ZJPN.TO
26.2%

Financial Services

JAPN.TO
18.9%
ZJPN.TO
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JAPN.TO
16.1%
ZJPN.TO
12.7%

Technology

JAPN.TO
12.0%
ZJPN.TO
17.6%

Basic Materials

JAPN.TO
7.8%
ZJPN.TO
3.6%

Healthcare

JAPN.TO
6.8%
ZJPN.TO
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

JAPN.TO
4.8%
ZJPN.TO
3.9%

Communication Services

JAPN.TO
3.8%
ZJPN.TO
8.6%

Energy

JAPN.TO
1.9%
ZJPN.TO
0.9%

Utilities

JAPN.TO
0.1%
ZJPN.TO
1.3%

Real Estate

JAPN.TO

-

ZJPN.TO
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAPN.TO
JAPN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JAPN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ZJPN.TO
ZJPN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZJPN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) and BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAPN.TOZJPN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.31

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

2.51

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.52

8.78

+8.74

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAPN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the ZJPN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAPN.TO and ZJPN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAPN.TOZJPN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

1.67

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.89

+0.04

Drawdowns

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAPN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, which is greater than ZJPN.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAPN.TO and ZJPN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAPN.TOZJPN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.88%

-17.03%

-11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-12.72%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-14.45%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-4.36%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.63%

-0.68%

Volatility

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) is 3.65%, while BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN.TO) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that JAPN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZJPN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAPN.TOZJPN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

4.75%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

14.75%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

19.10%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

17.03%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

17.03%

+2.64%

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAPN.TO has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ZJPN.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAPN.TO vs. ZJPN.TO - Dividend Comparison

JAPN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than ZJPN.TO's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JAPN.TO
CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF
2.02%2.08%1.58%1.51%2.59%1.35%1.36%2.12%0.62%
ZJPN.TO
BMO Japan Index ETF
1.18%1.45%1.79%2.05%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAPN.TO and ZJPN.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZJPN.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZJPN.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for JAPN.TO.

JAPN.TO tracks WisdomTree Japan Equity Index CAD, while ZJPN.TO tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for JAPN.TO and 0.39% for ZJPN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAPN.TO and ZJPN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer