PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JAPN.TO having a 19.69% return and QQQY.TO slightly lower at 19.46%.


JAPN.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
6.06%
YTD
19.69%
6M
22.60%
1Y
53.10%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
25.69%
10Y*

QQQY.TO

1D
-0.99%
1M
10.08%
YTD
19.46%
6M
18.17%
1Y
50.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JAPN.TO
CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF
19.69%30.66%29.25%4.21%
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
19.46%24.48%28.32%255,247.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JAPN.TO and QQQY.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023

0.37

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JAPN.TO
QQQY.TO

Industrials

27.8%
0.3%

Financial Services

18.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
1.0%

Technology

12.0%
79.0%

Basic Materials

7.8%

-

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Communication Services

3.8%
19.7%

Energy

1.9%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

JAPN.TO
27.8%
QQQY.TO
0.3%

Financial Services

JAPN.TO
18.9%
QQQY.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

JAPN.TO
16.1%
QQQY.TO
1.0%

Technology

JAPN.TO
12.0%
QQQY.TO
79.0%

Basic Materials

JAPN.TO
7.8%
QQQY.TO

-

Healthcare

JAPN.TO
6.8%
QQQY.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

JAPN.TO
4.8%
QQQY.TO

-

Communication Services

JAPN.TO
3.8%
QQQY.TO
19.7%

Energy

JAPN.TO
1.9%
QQQY.TO

-

Utilities

JAPN.TO
0.1%
QQQY.TO

-

Real Estate

JAPN.TO

-

QQQY.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAPN.TO
JAPN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
JAPN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY.TO
QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAPN.TOQQQY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.46

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

3.37

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.07

13.22

+4.85

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAPN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAPN.TO and QQQY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAPN.TOQQQY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.68

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.02

+0.92

Drawdowns

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAPN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, which is greater than QQQY.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAPN.TO and QQQY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAPN.TOQQQY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.88%

-26.27%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-14.91%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.13%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-4.02%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.79%

-0.84%

Volatility

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) is 3.43%, while Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that JAPN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAPN.TOQQQY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

4.81%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

14.68%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

18.76%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

134,195.03%

-134,176.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

134,195.03%

-134,175.36%

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAPN.TO has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAPN.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Dividend Comparison

JAPN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than QQQY.TO's 12.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JAPN.TO
CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF
2.02%2.08%1.58%1.51%2.59%1.35%1.36%2.12%0.62%
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
12.41%13.97%14.09%2.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAPN.TO and QQQY.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JAPN.TO is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JAPN.TO is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for QQQY.TO.

JAPN.TO is categorized as Japan Equities, while QQQY.TO is Nasdaq-100. JAPN.TO tracks WisdomTree Japan Equity Index CAD, while QQQY.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for JAPN.TO and 0.74% for QQQY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAPN.TO and QQQY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer