JANZ vs. DMAX
JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) and DMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. JANZ is actively managed, while DMAX is passively managed. Over the past year, JANZ returned 21.71% vs 8.68% for DMAX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DMAX.
Performance
JANZ vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's 2.42% return.
JANZ
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANZ vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 8.83% | 12.91% |
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF | 2.42% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANZ and DMAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JANZ and DMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANZ vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank
JANZ
DMAX
JANZ vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANZ | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 3.74 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.23 | 5.80 | -2.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.81 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 6.15 | -2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | 31.49 | -17.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANZ | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 3.74 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 2.16 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
JANZ vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and DMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANZ | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -3.37% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -1.41% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -0.38% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 0.28% | +1.26% |
Volatility
JANZ vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.33%. This indicates that JANZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANZ | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 0.33% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 1.54% | +5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.40% | 2.33% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 3.40% | +9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 3.40% | +9.58% |
JANZ vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANZ vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison
JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than DMAX's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF | 1.15% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 1.31% | 1.42% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 0.21% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JANZ and DMAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JANZ has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to DMAX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANZ dropped -18.11% vs DMAX's -3.37%.
On 1-year performance, JANZ leads with 21.71% vs 8.68% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JANZ has performed better with a 21.71% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANZ.
JANZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.15% for DMAX.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANZ and 0.50% for DMAX.
DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JANZ and DMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer