PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANWX vs. PGVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Research Fund (JANWX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANWX achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 19.58% return. Over the past 10 years, JANWX has outperformed PGVFX with an annualized return of 14.17%, while PGVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.65% annualized return.


JANWX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
6.82%
6M
5.98%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
14.17%

PGVFX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.43%
YTD
19.58%
6M
19.48%
1Y
37.18%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JANWX
Janus Henderson Global Research Fund
6.82%20.79%23.54%26.78%-19.56%17.84%20.20%28.89%-6.88%26.87%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
19.58%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JANWX and PGVFX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2010

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between JANWX and PGVFX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANWX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANWX
JANWX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
JANWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JANWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Research Fund (JANWX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANWXPGVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.56

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

4.21

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

15.14

-7.93

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANWX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANWX drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANWX and PGVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWXPGVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-68.09%

+33.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-8.76%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-12.53%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-27.58%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-41.26%

+6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-1.35%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-11.28%

+6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.43%

+0.02%

Volatility

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Research Fund (JANWX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 4.66%. This indicates that JANWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWXPGVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

4.66%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

10.39%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

12.43%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

13.89%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

15.71%

+2.25%

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANWX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANWX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

JANWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than PGVFX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JANWX
Janus Henderson Global Research Fund
7.57%8.09%8.33%4.90%4.56%11.67%3.75%4.84%6.93%0.68%0.83%0.81%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.33%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANWX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JANWX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to PGVFX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANWX dropped -34.78% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANWX and PGVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer