JANW vs. SPBU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JANW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF) and SPBU (AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JANW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while SPBU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANW returned 12.80% vs 20.62% for SPBU. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for SPBU.

Performance

JANW vs. SPBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPBU's 8.31% return.

JANW

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 5.14%
• 1Y: 12.80%
• 3Y*: 10.93%
• 5Y*: 8.21%
• 10Y*: —

SPBU

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 20.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANW vs. SPBU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF	4.39%	10.68%
SPBU AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF	8.31%	13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between JANW and SPBU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.90

The correlation between JANW and SPBU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JANW vs. SPBU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JANW	SPBU
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

JANW vs. SPBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW

JANW Risk / Return Rank: 85
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SPBU

SPBU Risk / Return Rank: 66
SPBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SPBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPBU Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SPBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SPBU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. SPBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANW	SPBU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.19	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	3.14	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.40	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	2.92	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.45	12.73	+6.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANW vs. SPBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the SPBU Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and SPBU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANW	SPBU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.19	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	1.59	-0.31

Drawdowns

JANW vs. SPBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, which is greater than SPBU's maximum drawdown of -8.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and SPBU.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANW	SPBU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-8.30%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-7.10%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.59%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-1.25%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	1.62%	-0.96%

Volatility

JANW vs. SPBU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 0.78%, while AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPBU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANW	SPBU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	2.66%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.66%	6.95%	-3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.59%	9.46%	-4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.77%	11.65%	-4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.67%	11.65%	-4.98%

JANW vs. SPBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SPBU's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANW vs. SPBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANW nor SPBU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANW and SPBU in my portfolio?

JANW and SPBU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANW or SPBU?

SPBU has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to JANW (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs SPBU's -8.30%.

Which ETF is better, JANW or SPBU?

On 1-year performance, SPBU leads with 20.62% vs 12.80% for JANW. On fees, JANW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JANW has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANW or SPBU?

Over the 1-year period, SPBU has performed better with a 20.62% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANW or SPBU?

JANW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANW or SPBU?

JANW and SPBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANW and SPBU?

JANW is categorized as Options Trading, while SPBU is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.79% for SPBU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.