JANW vs. OILK
JANW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JANW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. JANW is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JANW returned 8.21%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JANW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
JANW vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
JANW
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
JANW vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | 4.39% | 10.05% | 10.99% | 14.56% | -0.60% | 7.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 67.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANW and OILK is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between JANW and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JANW vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JANW
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JANW
OILK
-
Financial Services
JANW
OILK
-
Communication Services
JANW
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
JANW
OILK
Healthcare
JANW
OILK
-
Industrials
JANW
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
JANW
OILK
-
Energy
JANW
OILK
-
Utilities
JANW
OILK
-
Real Estate
JANW
OILK
-
Basic Materials
JANW
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANW vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
JANW
OILK
JANW vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 2.06 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.22 | 2.59 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.34 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 3.42 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.45 | 6.91 | +12.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.06 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.59 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.12 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
JANW vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -83.76% | +74.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -17.35% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.66% | -23.42% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.69% | -34.69% | +25.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -3.66% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -32.61% | +31.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 8.56% | -7.90% |
Volatility
JANW vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 0.78%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 10.44% | -9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.66% | 23.26% | -19.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 28.75% | -24.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 30.12% | -23.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 35.97% | -29.30% |
JANW vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANW vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
JANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JANW and OILK have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to JANW (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 8.21% for JANW. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, JANW has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JANW.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for JANW.
JANW is categorized as Options Trading, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.68% for OILK.
JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JANW and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer