PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. JUNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANW vs. JUNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than JUNT's 2.64% return.


JANW

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
3.86%
6M
3.89%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*

JUNT

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.40%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANW vs. JUNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JANW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
3.86%10.05%10.99%7.96%
JUNT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF
2.64%12.42%16.03%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JANW and JUNT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2023

0.87

The correlation between JANW and JUNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. JUNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

JUNT
JUNT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JUNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. JUNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANWJUNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.36

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.62

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

13.39

+2.88

JANW vs. JUNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the JUNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and JUNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANW vs. JUNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum JUNT drawdown of -12.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and JUNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWJUNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-12.78%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-4.08%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

-12.78%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-1.92%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.98%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.80%

-0.13%

Volatility

JANW vs. JUNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 1.46%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JUNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWJUNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

2.92%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

5.15%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

6.25%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.80%

9.29%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

9.29%

-2.63%

JANW vs. JUNT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANW and JUNT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

JANW vs. JUNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANW nor JUNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JANW and JUNT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JUNT has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to JANW (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs JUNT's -12.78%.

On 3-year performance, JUNT leads with 13.18% vs 10.36% for JANW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, JANW has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JUNT has performed better with a 13.18% return vs 10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANW and JUNT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

JANW and JUNT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANW and JUNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer