PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. JULT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANW vs. JULT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than JULT's 5.93% return.


JANW

1D
0.08%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.51%
6M
5.31%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*

JULT

1D
0.04%
1M
1.74%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.89%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANW vs. JULT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JANW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
4.51%10.05%10.99%14.56%-0.60%7.00%
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
5.93%13.73%17.43%21.34%-5.57%10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JANW and JULT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021

0.87

The correlation between JANW and JULT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JANW vs. JULT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JANW
JULT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

JANW
36.2%
JULT
36.2%

Financial Services

JANW
11.9%
JULT
11.9%

Communication Services

JANW
10.9%
JULT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JANW
10.1%
JULT
10.1%

Healthcare

JANW
8.4%
JULT
8.4%

Industrials

JANW
8.1%
JULT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

JANW
4.9%
JULT
4.9%

Energy

JANW
3.5%
JULT
3.5%

Utilities

JANW
2.3%
JULT
2.3%

Real Estate

JANW
1.9%
JULT
1.9%

Basic Materials

JANW
1.8%
JULT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. JULT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JULT
JULT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. JULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANWJULTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.89

2.63

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

3.85

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.54

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.69

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.47

19.84

+0.63

JANW vs. JULT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the JULT Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and JULT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANWJULTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.63

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

1.16

+0.12

Drawdowns

JANW vs. JULT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum JULT drawdown of -13.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and JULT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWJULTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-13.57%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-5.22%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

-13.57%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

-13.57%

+3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-1.78%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.97%

-0.31%

Volatility

JANW vs. JULT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) at 0.65%. This indicates that JANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWJULTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.65%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

5.25%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

7.25%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

11.00%

-4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

10.49%

-3.82%

JANW vs. JULT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANW and JULT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

JANW vs. JULT - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANW nor JULT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JANW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JANW and JULT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JANW has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to JULT (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs JULT's -13.57%.

On 5-year performance, JULT leads with 11.36% vs 8.29% for JANW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, JULT has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JULT has performed better with a 11.36% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANW and JULT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

JANW and JULT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANW and JULT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer