PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. DIVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANW vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.73% return.


JANW

1D
0.29%
1M
0.99%
6M
4.65%
YTD
5.55%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.31%

DIVN

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.08%
6M
7.52%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.52M$5.71M$2.75M
$389.31K$1.17M$958.18K

JANW vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANW and DIVN is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JANW vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANWDIVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

4.06

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

11.43

+5.27

JANW vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANW vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and DIVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWDIVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-5.55%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-5.55%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.45%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-1.35%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.97%

-1.29%

Volatility

JANW vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 1.24%, while Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWDIVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

3.04%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.01%

7.52%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

10.36%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

10.51%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.63%

10.51%

-3.88%

JANW vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANW vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

JANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JANW and DIVN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVN has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to JANW (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.46% vs 11.30% for JANW. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, JANW has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.46% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JANW.

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.00% for JANW.

JANW is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.70% for DIVN.

JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANW and DIVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer