JANU vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JANU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - JANU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by AllianzIM, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). JANU is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, JANU returned 18.87% vs 31.36% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. JANU charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

JANU vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANU achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.78% return.

JANU

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 6.77%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 31.36%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 23.50%
• 10Y*: 13.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANU vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF	6.77%	12.02%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	9.78%	9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JANU and YCS is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	-0.03

The correlation between JANU and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JANU vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANU

JANU Risk / Return Rank: 60
JANU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
JANU Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JANU Omega Ratio Rank: 56
JANU Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JANU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 61
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANU vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANU	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.86	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.37	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.79	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.91	11.86	+0.05

JANU vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANU and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANU vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANU drawdown since its inception was -11.84%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANU and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANU	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.84%	-49.56%	+37.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.98%	-8.30%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	0.00%	-1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-19.88%	+18.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.65%	-1.06%

Volatility

JANU vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that JANU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANU	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	2.22%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.35%	12.19%	-4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.07%	16.96%	-6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.60%	21.10%	-9.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.60%	18.96%	-7.36%

JANU vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANU vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANU nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANU and YCS in my portfolio?

JANU and YCS have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANU or YCS?

JANU has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANU dropped -11.84% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, JANU or YCS?

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.36% vs 18.87% for JANU. On fees, JANU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANU or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.36% return vs 18.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANU or YCS?

JANU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANU or YCS?

JANU and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANU and YCS?

JANU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANU and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.