JANT vs. HOCT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JANT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JANT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HOCT.

Performance

JANT vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JANT

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: —

HOCT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANT vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JANT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF	5.71%
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October	0.00%

Return for Risk

JANT vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANT

JANT Risk / Return Rank: 83
JANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
JANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JANT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JANT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANT vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANT	HOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.58	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANT	HOCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	—	—

Drawdowns

JANT vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and HOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANT	HOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.18%	0.00%	-16.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	0.00%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	0.00%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JANT	HOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.44%	0.00%	+7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.31%	0.00%	+11.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.10%	0.00%	+11.10%

JANT vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANT vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANT nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, JANT or HOCT?

On fees, JANT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANT or HOCT?

JANT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANT or HOCT?

JANT and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANT and HOCT?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANT and 0.79% for HOCT.