PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANT vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JANT vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JANT vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JANT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
-2.15%14.30%16.01%22.92%-10.31%13.68%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
1.84%6.18%11.25%12.38%-2.90%5.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANT achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 1.84% return.


JANT

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-2.15%
6M
1.33%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*

APRW

1D
0.35%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.84%
6M
3.66%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JANT vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANT and APRW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

JANT vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANT
JANT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANT vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANTAPRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.52

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

2.26

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.89

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.81

13.00

-4.19

JANT vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANT Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANT and APRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANTAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.52

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.99

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.05

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between JANT and APRW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JANT vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANT nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
JANT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%

Drawdowns

JANT vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than APRW's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and APRW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JANTAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.18%

-9.61%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-5.62%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-9.61%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

0.00%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-1.15%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.82%

+0.86%

Volatility

JANT vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.77%. This indicates that JANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JANTAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

0.77%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.00%

1.63%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

6.92%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

6.73%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

6.47%

+4.74%