JANP vs. MSTQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JANP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January) and MSTQ (LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANP returned 17.69% vs 31.81% for MSTQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for MSTQ.

Performance

JANP vs. MSTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANP achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than MSTQ's 17.40% return.

JANP

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTQ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 9.02%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 31.81%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANP vs. MSTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	6.08%	13.33%	15.74%
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	17.40%	20.57%	21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JANP and MSTQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024	0.82

The correlation between JANP and MSTQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANP vs. MSTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANP

JANP Risk / Return Rank: 81
JANP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
JANP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
JANP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JANP Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
JANP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MSTQ

MSTQ Risk / Return Rank: 59
MSTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MSTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
MSTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MSTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MSTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANP vs. MSTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANP	MSTQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.23	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	2.97	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.39	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.58	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.41	8.04	+9.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANP vs. MSTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANP Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the MSTQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANP and MSTQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANP	MSTQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.23	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	0.87	+0.75

Drawdowns

JANP vs. MSTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANP drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, smaller than the maximum MSTQ drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANP and MSTQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANP	MSTQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.18%	-31.05%	+18.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.32%	-12.39%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.21%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-8.62%	+7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	3.97%	-2.95%

Volatility

JANP vs. MSTQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) is 1.39%, while LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that JANP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANP	MSTQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	4.25%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.52%	10.58%	-5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.77%	14.35%	-7.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.07%	18.85%	-9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.07%	18.85%	-9.78%

JANP vs. MSTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTQ's 1.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANP vs. MSTQ - Dividend Comparison

JANP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	11.90%	13.97%	3.72%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANP and MSTQ in my portfolio?

JANP and MSTQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANP or MSTQ?

MSTQ has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to JANP (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANP dropped -12.18% vs MSTQ's -31.05%.

Which ETF is better, JANP or MSTQ?

On 1-year performance, MSTQ leads with 31.81% vs 17.69% for JANP. On fees, JANP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JANP has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANP or MSTQ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTQ has performed better with a 31.81% return vs 17.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANP or MSTQ?

JANP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANP or MSTQ?

MSTQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.90%, compared with 0.00% for JANP.

What is the main difference between JANP and MSTQ?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Little Harbor Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JANP and 1.59% for MSTQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.