PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANP vs. DSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANP vs. DSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANP achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly higher than DSEP's 4.80% return.


JANP

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.29%
YTD
5.25%
6M
5.30%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DSEP

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.02%
YTD
4.80%
6M
4.40%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANP vs. DSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANP and DSEP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024

0.92

The correlation between JANP and DSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANP vs. DSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANP
JANP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JANP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JANP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DSEP
DSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANP vs. DSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANPDSEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.67

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

13.09

+1.60

JANP vs. DSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANP Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the DSEP Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANP and DSEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANP vs. DSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANP drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, roughly equal to the maximum DSEP drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANP and DSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANPDSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.18%

-11.78%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-4.54%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.75%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-1.84%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.93%

+0.10%

Volatility

JANP vs. DSEP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) at 1.76%. This indicates that JANP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANPDSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

1.76%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.86%

4.74%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.92%

5.91%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.06%

7.78%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.06%

7.47%

+1.59%

JANP vs. DSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DSEP's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANP vs. DSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANP nor DSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JANP and DSEP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JANP has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to DSEP (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANP dropped -12.18% vs DSEP's -11.78%.

On 1-year performance, JANP leads with 15.16% vs 12.09% for DSEP. On fees, JANP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JANP has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DSEP.

JANP and DSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JANP and 0.85% for DSEP.

JANP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANP and DSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer