JANM vs. KMAR

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

JANM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January) and KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. JANM is actively managed, while KMAR is passively managed. Over the past year, JANM returned 6.77% vs 21.58% for KMAR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KMAR.

Performance

JANM vs. KMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANM achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than KMAR's 11.85% return.

JANM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: 2.80%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 1Y: 6.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KMAR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 9.31%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANM vs. KMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January	2.95%	6.06%
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	11.85%	11.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JANM and KMAR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025	0.74

The correlation between JANM and KMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANM vs. KMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANM

JANM Risk / Return Rank: 93
JANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
JANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
JANM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
JANM Martin Ratio Rank: 94

KMAR

KMAR Risk / Return Rank: 89
KMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
KMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
KMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANM vs. KMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANM	KMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.25	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	3.31	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.42	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	4.27	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.39	17.54	+3.85

JANM vs. KMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the KMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANM and KMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANM vs. KMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANM drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum KMAR drawdown of -11.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANM and KMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANM	KMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-11.32%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.70%	-4.89%	+3.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.32%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-1.30%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	1.19%	-0.87%

Volatility

JANM vs. KMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) is 0.78%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that JANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANM	KMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	2.13%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.99%	6.69%	-4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39%	9.29%	-6.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.89%	11.98%	-9.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.89%	11.98%	-9.09%

JANM vs. KMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANM vs. KMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANM nor KMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANM and KMAR in my portfolio?

JANM and KMAR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANM or KMAR?

KMAR has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to JANM (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANM dropped -2.83% vs KMAR's -11.32%.

Which ETF is better, JANM or KMAR?

On 1-year performance, KMAR leads with 21.58% vs 6.77% for JANM. On fees, KMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, JANM has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANM or KMAR?

Over the 1-year period, KMAR has performed better with a 21.58% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANM or KMAR?

KMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JANM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANM or KMAR?

JANM and KMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANM and KMAR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JANM and 0.79% for KMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.