PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANJ vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANJ vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANJ achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.21% return.


JANJ

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.68%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.21%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
0.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANJ vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANJ and TLTW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANJ vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANJ
JANJ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JANJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JANJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANJ vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANJTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.24

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.76

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.10

5.28

+14.82

JANJ vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANJ and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANJTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.37

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

-0.03

+1.28

Drawdowns

JANJ vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANJ drawdown since its inception was -5.75%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANJ and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANJTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-18.61%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-5.97%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-3.20%

+3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-8.25%

+8.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

1.99%

-1.70%

Volatility

JANJ vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) is 0.32%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that JANJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANJTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

2.48%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.43%

5.79%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

7.70%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

11.39%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

11.39%

-6.84%

JANJ vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANJ vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

JANJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than TLTW's 11.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JANJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January
5.00%5.07%5.59%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.76%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANJ and TLTW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTW has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to JANJ (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANJ dropped -5.75% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

On 1-year performance, TLTW leads with 10.46% vs 5.91% for JANJ. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JANJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLTW has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANJ.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 5.00% for JANJ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANJ and 0.35% for TLTW.

JANJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANJ and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer