JANJ vs. FEBP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JANJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January) and FEBP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANJ returned 5.91% vs 18.57% for FEBP. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FEBP.

Performance

JANJ vs. FEBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANJ achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than FEBP's 6.79% return.

JANJ

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 5.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEBP

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANJ vs. FEBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JANJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January	2.40%	5.22%	5.15%
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	6.79%	12.06%	12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between JANJ and FEBP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.73

The correlation between JANJ and FEBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANJ vs. FEBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANJ

JANJ Risk / Return Rank: 81
JANJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JANJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
JANJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
JANJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JANJ Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FEBP

FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 82
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANJ vs. FEBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANJ	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.68	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	3.85	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.53	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.41	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.10	17.60	+2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANJ vs. FEBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FEBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANJ and FEBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANJ	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.68	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.53	-0.28

Drawdowns

JANJ vs. FEBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANJ drawdown since its inception was -5.75%, smaller than the maximum FEBP drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANJ and FEBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANJ	FEBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-12.11%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.88%	-5.47%	+3.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.26%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.91%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	1.06%	-0.77%

Volatility

JANJ vs. FEBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) is 0.32%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that JANJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANJ	FEBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	1.42%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.43%	5.44%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	6.96%	-4.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.55%	8.98%	-4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.55%	8.98%	-4.43%

JANJ vs. FEBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANJ vs. FEBP - Dividend Comparison

JANJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, while FEBP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JANJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January	5.00%	5.07%	5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANJ and FEBP in my portfolio?

JANJ and FEBP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANJ or FEBP?

FEBP has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JANJ (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANJ dropped -5.75% vs FEBP's -12.11%.

Which ETF is better, JANJ or FEBP?

On 1-year performance, FEBP leads with 18.57% vs 5.91% for JANJ. On fees, FEBP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JANJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANJ or FEBP?

Over the 1-year period, FEBP has performed better with a 18.57% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANJ or FEBP?

FEBP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANJ or FEBP?

JANJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.00% for FEBP.

What is the main difference between JANJ and FEBP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANJ and 0.50% for FEBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.