PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANH vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANH vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANH achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 10.62% return.


JANH

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.69%
6M
3.72%
YTD
3.95%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVII

1D
-2.36%
1M
0.29%
6M
9.98%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANH vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANH and NVII is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.51

The correlation between JANH and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANH vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANH
JANH Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANH vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANHNVIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.14

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.35

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.56

2.93

+10.63

JANH vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANH Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANH and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANH vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANH drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum NVII drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANH and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANHNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-18.56%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-18.56%

+15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-12.41%

+12.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-6.26%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

8.55%

-8.05%

Volatility

JANH vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is 0.68%, while REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that JANH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANHNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

10.47%

-9.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

27.99%

-24.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

36.33%

-32.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

35.54%

-29.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.25%

35.54%

-29.29%

JANH vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANH vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

JANH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than NVII's 57.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
6.21%6.20%6.71%
NVII
REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF
57.03%29.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANH and NVII have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to JANH (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANH dropped -8.00% vs NVII's -18.56%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 24.97% vs 6.73% for JANH. On fees, JANH is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, JANH has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 24.97% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANH is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 57.03%, compared with 6.21% for JANH.

JANH is categorized as Options Trading, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANH and 0.99% for NVII.

JANH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANH and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer