PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANH vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANH vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANH achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's 1.82% return.


JANH

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.48%
YTD
3.06%
6M
3.17%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZY

1D
-2.70%
1M
-8.38%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.92%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANH vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANH and AMZY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.55

The correlation between JANH and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANH vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANH
JANH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANH Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANH vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANHAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.11

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

0.61

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

1.52

+13.58

JANH vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANH Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANH and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANHAMZYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.51

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.91

+0.17

Drawdowns

JANH vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANH drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANH and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANHAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-23.70%

+15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-19.61%

+16.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-9.08%

+8.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-5.33%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

7.91%

-7.41%

Volatility

JANH vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is 0.56%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that JANH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANHAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

6.57%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

16.35%

-13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49%

23.76%

-20.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

25.09%

-18.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

25.09%

-18.71%

JANH vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANH vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

JANH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, less than AMZY's 54.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
54.35%52.59%47.91%9.90%
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
6.14%6.20%6.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANH and AMZY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to JANH (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANH dropped -8.00% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 12.00% vs 7.47% for JANH. On fees, JANH is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, JANH has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANH is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 54.35%, compared with 6.14% for JANH.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANH and 0.99% for AMZY.

JANH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANH and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer