JANFX vs. LCTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund (JANFX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX).
JANFX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jul 7, 1987. LCTRX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANFX Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund | -0.65% | 7.63% | 1.95% | 5.11% | -13.76% | -0.85% | 10.82% | 9.50% | -0.96% | 3.56% |
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares | -0.02% | 4.72% | 6.03% | 8.26% | 2.22% | 1.99% | 12.07% | 1.15% | 6.01% | 4.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANFX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JANFX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.03% annualized return.
JANFX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
LCTRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JANFX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank
JANFX
LCTRX
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund (JANFX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANFX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.80 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 3.45 | -2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.62 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.22 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 10.58 | -6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANFX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.80 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 2.02 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between JANFX and LCTRX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison
JANFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than LCTRX's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANFX Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund | 4.35% | 4.72% | 4.99% | 3.42% | 2.70% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.96% | 3.10% | 2.92% | 2.73% | 2.62% |
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares | 5.01% | 5.53% | 5.57% | 5.31% | 2.18% | 1.69% | 1.17% | 2.40% | 3.31% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANFX drawdown since its inception was -24.46%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANFX and LCTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANFX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.46% | -26.09% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -1.17% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -3.82% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.61% | -23.93% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -1.17% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -4.16% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.36% | +0.64% |
Volatility
JANFX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund (JANFX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.55%. This indicates that JANFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JANFX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.55% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 1.32% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 1.90% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 2.47% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.99% | 6.32% | -1.33% |