PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANB vs. PQAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANB vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANB achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.


JANB

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.08%
6M
7.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PQAP

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.44%
YTD
12.09%
6M
13.01%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANB vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JANB
Aptus January Buffer ETF
6.08%2.69%
PQAP
PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April
12.09%2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between JANB and PQAP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANB vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANB

PQAP
PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANB vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JANB vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANBPQAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.76

+0.20

Drawdowns

JANB vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANB drawdown since its inception was -6.52%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANB and PQAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANBPQAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-10.79%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.12%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-0.60%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

JANB vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANBPQAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

4.45%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.41%

11.03%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.41%

11.03%

-3.62%

JANB vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANB vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM2025
JANB
Aptus January Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%
PQAP
PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April
0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANB and PQAP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PQAP.

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JANB and 0.50% for PQAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANB and PQAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer