PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMVX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMVX achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMVX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


JAMVX

1D
1.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
11.09%
6M
11.39%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.09%

VMFVX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.15%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.65%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
11.09%6.55%13.06%11.41%-5.51%19.72%-1.08%30.39%-13.59%13.98%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.39%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMVX and VMFVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.95

The correlation between JAMVX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMVX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAMVX
JAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAMVXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.51

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

2.28

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.18

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.20

7.51

+1.70

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMVX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAMVXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.51

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Drawdowns

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMVX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, roughly equal to the maximum VMFVX drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMVX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMVXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-45.79%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-10.52%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-22.46%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-22.46%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-45.79%

+5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-5.48%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.05%

-0.75%

Volatility

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) is 3.67%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that JAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMVXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.02%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

10.50%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

15.14%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

19.47%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

21.88%

-3.93%

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMVX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

JAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, more than VMFVX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
9.77%10.85%6.16%3.67%9.77%0.43%2.85%8.72%12.17%4.32%14.88%12.31%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.72%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JAMVX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFVX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to JAMVX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMVX dropped -46.19% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

JAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMVX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer