PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMVX vs. NAMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMVX achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly lower than NAMAX's 25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMVX has underperformed NAMAX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while NAMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


JAMVX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.36%
6M
7.97%
YTD
13.37%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
9.00%
ALL TIME*
9.11%

NAMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.47%
6M
19.86%
YTD
25.51%
1Y
37.74%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
13.37%6.55%13.06%11.41%-5.51%19.72%-1.08%30.39%-13.59%13.98%
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
25.51%13.77%13.14%9.65%-9.33%32.28%6.90%31.56%-18.46%13.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMVX and NAMAX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2001

0.96

The correlation between JAMVX and NAMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMVX vs. NAMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAMVX
JAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NAMAX
NAMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NAMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAMVXNAMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.14

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

16.48

-9.20

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the NAMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMVX and NAMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMVX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, smaller than the maximum NAMAX drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMVX and NAMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMVXNAMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-60.44%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-8.49%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-20.90%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-20.90%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-43.24%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-1.21%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-8.45%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.14%

+0.15%

Volatility

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) is 2.71%, while Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that JAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMVXNAMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.90%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

10.79%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

14.17%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

17.97%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

20.00%

-2.11%

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than NAMAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMVX vs. NAMAX - Dividend Comparison

JAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than NAMAX's 5.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
4.19%10.85%6.16%3.67%9.77%0.43%2.85%8.72%12.17%4.32%14.88%12.31%
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
5.94%6.71%7.07%0.74%6.39%8.99%3.22%3.38%27.38%21.08%8.07%17.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JAMVX and NAMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NAMAX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to JAMVX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMVX dropped -46.19% vs NAMAX's -60.44%.

NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMVX and NAMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer