JAKRX vs. USGLX
JAKRX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A) and USGLX (John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - JAKRX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by John Hancock, while USGLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past year, JAKRX returned 26.01% vs -0.94% for USGLX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAKRX charges 1.91%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for USGLX.
Performance
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAKRX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than USGLX's -2.65% return.
JAKRX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USGLX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 12.80% | 17.04% |
USGLX John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund | -2.65% | 10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAKRX and USGLX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAKRX vs. USGLX — Risk / Return Rank
JAKRX
USGLX
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) and John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAKRX | USGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.01 | +0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | -0.03 | +5.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | -0.08 | +18.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAKRX | USGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58 | -0.03 | +3.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.97 | 0.50 | +3.47 |
Drawdowns
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAKRX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum USGLX drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKRX and USGLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAKRX | USGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -46.82% | +41.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -16.11% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -13.33% | +12.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -7.40% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 5.53% | -4.07% |
Volatility
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) is 2.41%, while John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that JAKRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAKRX | USGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 3.02% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.86% | 10.14% | -4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.43% | 13.36% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 21.00% | -13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 20.26% | -12.97% |
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAKRX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than USGLX's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAKRX vs. USGLX - Dividend Comparison
JAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than USGLX's 29.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 7.18% | 8.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USGLX John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund | 29.16% | 28.38% | 15.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.75% | 11.38% | 6.76% | 13.55% | 7.34% | 5.42% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAKRX and USGLX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USGLX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to JAKRX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKRX dropped -5.16% vs USGLX's -46.82%.
JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAKRX and USGLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer