PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAKRX vs. QLFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAKRX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than QLFRX's 0.25% return.


JAKRX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.80%
6M
13.69%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLFRX

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.51%
YTD
0.25%
6M
3.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAKRX and QLFRX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAKRX vs. QLFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAKRX
JAKRX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JAKRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QLFRX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAKRXQLFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAKRXQLFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.97

0.85

+3.11

Drawdowns

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAKRX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum QLFRX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKRX and QLFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAKRXQLFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-14.53%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.99%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-5.64%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAKRXQLFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

15.84%

-8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

15.84%

-8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

15.84%

-8.55%

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAKRX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFRX's 6.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Dividend Comparison

JAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than QLFRX's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JAKRX and QLFRX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAKRX and QLFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer