JAKRX vs. QLFRX
JAKRX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A) and QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JAKRX charges 1.91%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for QLFRX.
Performance
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAKRX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than QLFRX's 0.25% return.
JAKRX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFRX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 12.80% | 2.81% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.25% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAKRX and QLFRX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAKRX vs. QLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
JAKRX
QLFRX
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAKRX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAKRX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.97 | 0.85 | +3.11 |
Drawdowns
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAKRX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum QLFRX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKRX and QLFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAKRX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -14.53% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.99% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -5.64% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAKRX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.43% | 15.84% | -8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 15.84% | -8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 15.84% | -8.55% |
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAKRX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFRX's 6.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAKRX vs. QLFRX - Dividend Comparison
JAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than QLFRX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A | 7.18% | 8.10% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAKRX and QLFRX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for JAKRX and QLFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer