JACNX vs. JLGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX).
JACNX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Feb 29, 2000. JLGMX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACNX Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund | -4.88% | 7.34% | 18.44% | 21.58% | -21.54% | 20.79% | 27.88% | 43.19% | -4.08% | 5.00% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -8.48% | 14.38% | 35.40% | 34.95% | -25.20% | 18.48% | 56.39% | 39.47% | 0.74% | 38.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JACNX achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's -8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, JACNX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.
JACNX
- 1D
- 4.46%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
JLGMX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -10.35%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JACNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JACNX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank
JACNX
JLGMX
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JACNX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.05 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.81 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 2.47 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JACNX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.85 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.80 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between JACNX and JLGMX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison
JACNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, less than JLGMX's 12.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACNX Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund | 11.67% | 11.10% | 11.53% | 7.13% | 0.53% | 9.63% | 1.69% | 11.74% | 8.86% | 7.77% | 3.52% | 2.71% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 12.06% | 11.04% | 2.12% | 0.31% | 3.49% | 14.25% | 5.14% | 12.65% | 15.59% | 14.44% | 9.71% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JACNX drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACNX and JLGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JACNX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.81% | -31.82% | -34.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.27% | -16.73% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -31.13% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.25% | -31.82% | -8.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -13.83% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -5.82% | -8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 5.51% | -0.59% |
Volatility
JACNX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 6.48%. This indicates that JACNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JACNX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 6.48% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 12.54% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 21.14% | +3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 20.25% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 21.54% | +0.15% |