PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABVX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund (JABVX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABVX achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 19.80% return.


JABVX

1D
1.52%
1M
4.90%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.04%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
10Y*

MDGCX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.14%
YTD
19.80%
6M
21.05%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JABVX
John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund
16.89%6.57%3.45%19.30%-23.71%10.90%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
19.80%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JABVX and MDGCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021

0.89

The correlation between JABVX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABVX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABVX
JABVX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
JABVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JABVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund (JABVX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JABVXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

3.24

-2.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

4.35

-2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.59

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

5.05

-3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.94

23.35

-18.42

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABVX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JABVXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

3.24

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.66

-0.37

Drawdowns

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABVX drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABVX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABVXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-48.25%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-8.07%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.08%

-21.46%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.47%

-9.93%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

1.74%

+2.02%

Volatility

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund (JABVX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 3.75%. This indicates that JABVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABVXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

3.75%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

10.02%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.47%

12.57%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

16.15%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

17.25%

+1.96%

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JABVX and MDGCX have an expense ratio of 0.96%.


Dividends

JABVX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

JABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than MDGCX's 7.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JABVX
John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund
6.21%7.26%6.63%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.44%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


JABVX and MDGCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JABVX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to MDGCX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABVX dropped -33.96% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABVX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer