JABLX vs. MEIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX).
JABLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 12, 1993. MEIIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Feb 1, 1996.
Performance
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | -4.89% | 15.13% | 15.42% | 15.41% | -16.36% | 17.20% | 14.21% | 22.60% | 0.68% | 18.44% |
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | 1.07% | 13.26% | 11.86% | 8.21% | -6.02% | 25.43% | 3.99% | 30.04% | -9.90% | 17.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than MEIIX's 1.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JABLX having a 9.63% annualized return and MEIIX not far ahead at 9.90%.
JABLX
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
MEIIX
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 10.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABLX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JABLX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank
JABLX
MEIIX
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JABLX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.69 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.03 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.02 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 4.48 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABLX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.69 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.56 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between JABLX and MEIIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison
JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, less than MEIIX's 9.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | 5.42% | 5.16% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 4.78% | 1.58% | 3.14% | 4.43% | 5.22% | 1.71% | 3.64% | 5.22% |
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | 9.62% | 9.52% | 9.30% | 8.41% | 7.58% | 3.32% | 2.63% | 3.17% | 3.62% | 4.04% | 2.91% | 5.97% |
Drawdowns
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and MEIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABLX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -52.64% | +25.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -11.10% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -17.58% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.47% | -36.70% | +14.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -5.02% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -6.58% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.53% | -0.50% |
Volatility
JABLX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) at 3.64%. This indicates that JABLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JABLX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.64% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 7.85% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 14.83% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 13.92% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 16.56% | -5.48% |