PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABLX vs. JNRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with JABLX at 4.82% and JNRFX at 4.82%. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has underperformed JNRFX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while JNRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.79% annualized return.


JABLX

1D
0.95%
1M
1.23%
6M
5.25%
YTD
4.82%
1Y
9.94%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.38%
ALL TIME*
9.74%

JNRFX

1D
2.32%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.41%
YTD
4.82%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
15.79%
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
4.82%15.13%15.42%15.41%-16.36%17.20%14.21%22.60%0.68%18.44%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D
4.82%18.45%35.13%43.14%-29.96%20.19%32.82%35.40%-2.73%25.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JABLX and JNRFX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1993

0.90

The correlation between JABLX and JNRFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABLX vs. JNRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JABLX
JABLX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JABLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JABLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JNRFX
JNRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JNRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
JNRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JABLXJNRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

0.70

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

2.23

+3.61

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the JNRFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABLX and JNRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum JNRFX drawdown of -74.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and JNRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABLXJNRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-74.74%

+47.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-17.05%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-22.66%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-36.48%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.47%

-36.48%

+14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.27%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-24.85%

+20.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

5.35%

-3.43%

Volatility

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 2.87%, while Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABLXJNRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

7.20%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

15.45%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

18.58%

-9.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.29%

22.47%

-11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

21.51%

-10.35%

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABLX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than JNRFX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

JABLX vs. JNRFX - Dividend Comparison

JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%, less than JNRFX's 11.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
10.57%5.16%2.02%2.01%4.78%1.58%3.14%4.43%5.22%1.71%3.64%5.22%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D
11.39%11.94%5.11%2.93%0.43%13.01%2.98%10.37%11.06%8.22%5.41%9.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JABLX and JNRFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNRFX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to JABLX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABLX dropped -27.07% vs JNRFX's -74.74%.

JABLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABLX and JNRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer