JABLX vs. JNGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX).
JABLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 12, 1993. JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | -4.89% | 15.13% | 15.42% | 15.41% | -16.36% | 17.20% | 14.21% | 22.60% | 0.68% | 18.44% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -7.02% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly higher than JNGTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.41% annualized return.
JABLX
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
JNGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 20.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABLX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JABLX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JABLX
JNGTX
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JABLX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.16 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.73 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.80 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 6.10 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABLX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.16 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.41 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.84 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.44 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between JABLX and JNGTX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison
JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, less than JNGTX's 14.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | 5.42% | 5.16% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 4.78% | 1.58% | 3.14% | 4.43% | 5.22% | 1.71% | 3.64% | 5.22% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.43% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
Drawdowns
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and JNGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABLX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -84.79% | +57.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -15.93% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -46.46% | +25.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.47% | -46.46% | +23.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -12.54% | +6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -40.47% | +35.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 4.69% | -2.66% |
Volatility
JABLX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 4.07%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JABLX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 8.32% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 16.27% | -9.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 25.51% | -13.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 26.29% | -15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 24.40% | -13.32% |