JAAGX vs. MMGPX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JAAGX (Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JAAGX returned 6.95%/yr vs -7.52%/yr for MMGPX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JAAGX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.

Performance

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (JAAGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAGX achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.47% return.

JAAGX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 4.99%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: 12.91%
• 5Y*: 6.95%
• 10Y*: 13.23%

MMGPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.43%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 6M: -6.19%
• 1Y: -6.93%
• 3Y*: 21.96%
• 5Y*: -7.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JAAGX Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio	6.90%	7.68%	15.56%	18.04%	-15.71%	16.89%	18.93%	35.54%	-0.43%	22.71%
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio	-2.47%	12.58%	41.83%	44.34%	-63.37%	-11.55%	152.67%	40.20%	10.89%	28.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAGX and MMGPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.70

The correlation between JAAGX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JAAGX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAAGX

JAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
JAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
JAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
JAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
JAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
JAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MMGPX

MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (JAAGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JAAGX	MMGPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	-0.29	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	-0.22	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.97	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	-0.30	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	-0.60	+4.33

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAGX and MMGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.37%, which is greater than MMGPX's maximum drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAGX and MMGPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAAGX	MMGPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.37%	-75.38%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-27.79%	+16.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	-29.27%	+9.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.79%	-72.70%	+48.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-41.72%	+40.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.05%	-30.30%	+4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	13.70%	-10.42%

Volatility

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio (JAAGX) is 4.97%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that JAAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAAGX	MMGPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	9.69%	-4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.29%	21.69%	-10.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.30%	28.52%	-14.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.75%	39.82%	-22.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	35.21%	-16.43%

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAAGX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

JAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JAAGX Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Portfolio	8.16%	7.98%	4.65%	6.88%	20.52%	8.86%	6.34%	5.74%	5.49%	6.23%	8.15%	12.63%
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio	0.44%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	125.40%	64.53%	7.93%	15.63%	28.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAAGX and MMGPX in my portfolio?

JAAGX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAAGX or MMGPX?

MMGPX has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to JAAGX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAGX dropped -80.37% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.