JAAA vs. RAAA
JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.
Performance
JAAA vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than RAAA's 2.18% return.
JAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
RAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAAA vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 1.87% | 2.57% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 2.18% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAAA and RAAA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAAA vs. RAAA — Risk / Return Rank
JAAA
RAAA
JAAA vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.69 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.77 | 3.76 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
JAAA vs. RAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, which is greater than RAAA's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and RAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -0.71% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.23% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -0.06% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
JAAA vs. RAAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85% | 1.39% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 1.39% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.64% | 1.39% | +0.25% |
JAAA vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAAA vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison
JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than RAAA's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 5.00% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 4.79% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAAA and RAAA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.
JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.79% for RAAA.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JAAA and 0.30% for RAAA.
Find the right allocation for JAAA and RAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer